gary0618 Posted April 4, 2008 Posted April 4, 2008 Katie is taller than Tom, and Still almost always wears very high heels. KatieHolmes.bmp FLAT SHOES, LIKE FLAT DRINKS, ARE FOR FLAT PEOPLE
highheeltrained Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 Don't kid yourself, she just has high arches. 5 inches tops. they are obviousl at least 5.5 inch if not 6 inch heels
Trolldeg Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 they are obviousl at least 5.5 inch if not 6 inch heels No, they are not.
shrimper Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 HHT, Trolldeg has his opinion, we have ours. Until one of us gets a ruler and gets our hands on Fergie's feet in those shoes this topic is open for argument. That's not what I'm here for.
hoverfly Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 five with a plat. Hello,  my name is Hoverfly. I’m a high heel addict…. Weeeeeeeeeee!  👠1998 to 2022!
highheeltrained Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 the platform is about half and inch but the heel arch then selves is easily 5.5 inch. unless she has the smallest feet in the world. My mother has size 5 shoes and her 5 inch heels dont look that extreme.
Trolldeg Posted April 11, 2008 Posted April 11, 2008 You can continue with your wishful thinking, but that won't make it true...
Mr. X Posted April 11, 2008 Posted April 11, 2008 Now now ladies. Lets get back to the purpose of this thread. To show celebs in heels. Here are a few of my current additions.
shrimper Posted April 12, 2008 Posted April 12, 2008 You can continue with your wishful thinking, but that won't make it true... How are you so sure thats not the case? Inquiring minds want to know....
roniheels Posted April 13, 2008 Posted April 13, 2008 Thank you for sourcing these pictures. There are some good ones. Yes. Thank you for sharing those.
undertaker Posted April 14, 2008 Posted April 14, 2008 dutch olympic swimmer inge de bruijn in very pointy boots and high heels
Trolldeg Posted April 15, 2008 Posted April 15, 2008 How are you so sure thats not the case? Inquiring minds want to know.... Because: The shoes are made by Versace, it's the SS08 collection. Designers rarely make shoes higher than 5 inches without a platform. Here is a similar shoe by Versace, it is described as having a 5 inch heel and a .75 inch platform. http://www.eluxury.com/estore/browse/product_detail.jsp?id=11783848 Fergie is walking somewhat downhill in the picture, therefore you're tricked into thinking the heels are higher than what they really are.
gary0618 Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 Country Singer Crystal Gale. Looong Hair and Boots. FLAT SHOES, LIKE FLAT DRINKS, ARE FOR FLAT PEOPLE
billyb Posted April 16, 2008 Posted April 16, 2008 I used to have a crush on Crystal Gale back in the 70's
5150PLB1 Posted April 17, 2008 Posted April 17, 2008 I have been to one of Crystal Gale's concerts. She looks far better in person than she does in pictures.
highheeltrained Posted April 22, 2008 Posted April 22, 2008 Hillary Duff in over the knee boots. Wish more girls her age and younger wore over the knee and thigh high boots with heels this high or higher. http://bootshare.com/StreamFile?id=163662 http://bootshare.com/StreamFile?id=163657 http://bootshare.com/StreamFile?id=163660
Marcus Posted April 22, 2008 Posted April 22, 2008 She's even running with those boots, wow. Can you see the real me, preacher? Can you see the real me, doctor? Can you see the real me, mother? Can you see the real me?
Triple Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Hi! Gwyneth Paltrow in Berlin: http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrity_gallery/image_full/66054/ http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrity_gallery/image_full/66050/ http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrity_gallery/image_full/66047/ http://whenyourebored.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/ironmanpremier1.jpg http://whenyourebored.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/ironmanpremier2.jpg
Marcus Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Classy Loboutins, very nice. Can you see the real me, preacher? Can you see the real me, doctor? Can you see the real me, mother? Can you see the real me?
GuyB71 Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 I have to say that Gwyneth has incredible taste in shoes...
Stockw Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Love the Louboutins but what make are those other shoes Gwyneth is wearing? Honestly a girl can't have too many shoes!
mccar7hy Posted April 24, 2008 Posted April 24, 2008 whatever they are they're great, but probably cost what I pay for rent
Stockw Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 More Gwyneth, anyone know the make of these killer heels?! http://img245.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=17296_Gwyneth_Paltrow_5_6Ironman3_photocall_in_Rome4_Italy3_April_235_2008_-_21_122_235lo.jpg Honestly a girl can't have too many shoes!
Marcus Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 OmG, I want'em!!! Can you see the real me, preacher? Can you see the real me, doctor? Can you see the real me, mother? Can you see the real me?
Stockw Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 The answer can be found here! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=561220&in_page_id=1773 Amazing heels! Honestly a girl can't have too many shoes!
Puffer Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 The answer can be found here! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=561220&in_page_id=1773 Amazing heels! The Daily Mail page was updated to show Gwyneth wearing flat sandals later today; I suppose she deserves a few hours off! The Paccini shoes look hideous to me, and the heels are nothing like the 7" claimed - perhaps 5.5". And that includes at least 1" of clumpy platform. The Zanotti nude courts look very nice, with commendably thin stilettos about 6" high. But they would look even better without that hidden platform, which makes them look top-heavy. High stilleto shoes or boots need no embellishment; they look much more elegant with a single sole and a tapered or pointed closed toe - and maybe a slingback or discreet bow or buckle. Keep open toes for strappy sandals, the more open and spindly the better!
Puffer Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Gwyneth Paltrow has had more than her share of press comment in the last week as a result of the shoes she has been wearing. If her aim was to secure personal publicity, it has certainly succeeded. If one Googles 'Gwyneth Paltrow shoe' or similar, many articles, photos and comments can be seen. Gwyneth is attractive enough without being an outstanding beauty and is clearly not cheap, immature or stupid. I am sure that many women can relate to her even though they cannot enjoy the same lifestyle. I wonder, however, whether she has done the high heels cause more harm than good? Whatever one thinks of the particular styles she has been wearing, the common factor has been that her heels were high (albeit usually with a platform and with the height invariably exaggerated by the journalists). We can appreciate the attention she has drawn to 'high' heels and the boost this may possibly give to supply and demand. But the press and public comment has been largely unfavourable, concentrating (rather predictably) on the usual issues of discomfort, heath and impracticability rather than the overall look or style (which have both also been attacked). There don't seem to have been many supporters out there. Maybe the erroneous belief that most of her heels were six or seven inches high has dampened enthusiasm amongst those women who could wear a five inch heel (without a platform) - or at least would be willing to try - and assume that Gwyneth's shoes provide a greater rise than that and are simply 'too extreme'. And, when the copies hit the high street shops, they may be ignored because of that association. I hope I'm wrong!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now