Shyheels Posted May 21, 2023 Posted May 21, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Puffer said: Not in the UK, at least with people who endeavour to communicate effectively. You seem to forget I live in the UK. And writing and communication is my business. I do it effectively and have won awards for it, both in the UK and abroad. I might add that the Cambridge Dictionary includes “to impress” as a secondary definition of slay. I haven’t consulted the Oxford but I expect they’ll have the same. Edited May 21, 2023 by Shyheels
Puffer Posted May 21, 2023 Posted May 21, 2023 9 hours ago, Shyheels said: You seem to forget I live in the UK. And writing and communication is my business. I do it effectively and have won awards for it, both in the UK and abroad. I might add that the Cambridge Dictionary includes “to impress” as a secondary definition of slay. I haven’t consulted the Oxford but I expect they’ll have the same. I am well aware of your residence and occupation - and that you grew up overseas. Communication was a large part of my career too but has not embraced slang or idiomatic expressions in great depth, I am pleased to say. The dictionary may well include the secondary definitions you mention but that is not to say that they will be used and understood as universally as you suggest. I accept that the meanings exist, but not their appeal.
Shyheels Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 Like everyone I use idiom and slang and am familiar with their use by others. When I say I am a writer, I do not mean of legal documents, but of what are meant to be bright engaging magazine features using the full palette of the English language. And believe me the use of the word slay, as a metaphor, is common and widely understood to mean impress or entertain both here and around the world in the Universal English our language has become. It was used as metaphor as far back as the 19th century, but it’s use it this sense has had skyrocketed in the past 50 years - starting in the 1970s, and led by the black, queer and Latin communities. Comedians have used it for years to indicate success, that they impressed or entertained. Its usage has accelerated even more in the past decade, popularised by stars like Beyonce and has widespread currency on Tik Tok. It is globally understood.
Puffer Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 I am not immune to the use of slang or idiom - in its place. But I have learned to avoid it in both personal or professional communication in contexts where it might be misunderstood or inappropriate I think we have both lost sight of the point here. It was not so much the secondary meaning of 'slay' (with which I am slightly acquainted) but that of 'kill' in the apparent sense quoted by Cali as in 'you killed the look'. What I cannot understand is that usage in the implied sense of met or fulfilled; it seems to me that anything 'killed' has been, at best, spoiled or stopped and at worst totally destroyed. That point was not answered. It may be commonplace for words or phrases to take on what are effectively opposite meanings in street parlance (e.g. wicked = good) but that is not to say that they should be universally adopted, especially when accuracy is required. I can think of many historic examples where imprecise or inverted language has caused real confusion, sometimes dangerously.
at9 Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 I'm glad to say that English is shaped primarily by usage. A proud mongrel tongue, unashamed of immigration. Unlike French where the Institut Francais attempts, not always successfully, to impose its view of language on the people. They can stuff their "fin de semaine" where the sun don't shine. There are many things I don't like about how our language is evolving. I live with them as part of a vibrant language. I even adopt some of them despite not really liking them. Such as "for free" rather than "free" or "for nothing". But if you ever catch me writing "would of" instead of "would have" you have permission to shoot me. But it may become accepted usage.
Shyheels Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 (edited) Why write “would of” when you can shorten it to “woulda”? In terms of the other part of the discussion, has no one ever heard the vaudevillian phrase “knock ‘em dead”? It’s not to be taken literally, any more than “break a leg”. “Lay ‘em in the aisles” and “slay ‘em” have been around for ages and are widely understood, and an accepted part of the vernacular. “You killed the look” is similarly widely understood and accepted. At any rate, I’m done with this. Seems to me we’ve hijacked Cali’s thread more than enough. Edited May 22, 2023 by Shyheels
Jkrenzer Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 Language is simply a tool to communicate. It evolves over time, sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse. Slange is often seen as laziness. I'll argue it's often more efficient. Thank God for evolution, or we'd all be speaking old English.
Shyheels Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 I remember having to learn the prolgue to The Canterbury Tales in Chaucerian English... 1
Puffer Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 'Mary spent more than an hour with her make-up before going out on her special date. She killed the look with extra blue eyeshadow.' So, did she improve her appearance or ruin it? (No peeping allowed.) 1
Jkrenzer Posted May 22, 2023 Posted May 22, 2023 In that context, it's good. In sports if a team kills another it dominated it. So Mary dominated the look she was going for.
Shyheels Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 (edited) Hopefuly she was wearing elegant heels - boots, naturally - as well! Edited May 23, 2023 by Shyheels
mlroseplant Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 22 hours ago, Shyheels said: I remember having to learn the prologue to The Canterbury Tales in Chaucerian English... As did I. I believe I can still get through the first eight lines of it. 11 hours ago, Puffer said: 'Mary spent more than an hour with her make-up before going out on her special date. She killed the look with extra blue eyeshadow.' So, did she improve her appearance or ruin it? (No peeping allowed.) 10 hours ago, Jkrenzer said: In that context, it's good. In sports if a team kills another it dominated it. So Mary dominated the look she was going for. I will have to disagree. It's still ambiguous. It probably means Mary did a good thing, but extra blue eye shadow is hardly ever a good thing. Setting aside my own biases, with the addition of one little word, "but," it would possibly change the whole meaning, and would be unambiguous. "But she killed the look with extra blue eye shadow."
Shyheels Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 Isn't the English language a rich one, with all its nuances and flexibility; more than a million words in all with contributions coming from 100 other languages.
Cali Posted May 23, 2023 Author Posted May 23, 2023 Back to heels. It's the start of Short Season here, so I wore some old wedges with my shorts to work today. 3
Cali Posted May 24, 2023 Author Posted May 24, 2023 After the winter we had in this area, really happy to break out the sandals and shorts.
Shyheels Posted May 24, 2023 Posted May 24, 2023 I’m boots and jeans year round, but I’ve certainly been glad to see some sunshine this past week. I know you guys over there had a lot of snow this year 1
Cali Posted May 24, 2023 Author Posted May 24, 2023 (edited) We had 7 atmospheric rivers hit us this winter. major destruction - roads - piers - towns - hillsides - floods .... The ski slope I ski most often had over 60.5 feet (about 18.5 meters) of snow this year. Edited May 24, 2023 by Cali 1
Shyheels Posted May 24, 2023 Posted May 24, 2023 Sounds pretty apocalyptic. We just had a rainy winter, with a few days of unpleasantly gusty winds
ohnoberty Posted May 24, 2023 Posted May 24, 2023 Excellent news, wedges are making the summer comeback! Very nice. 2
Cali Posted June 2, 2023 Author Posted June 2, 2023 I just read that in 2929 Steve Madden moved some of their production from China to Mexico and Brazil.
mlroseplant Posted June 3, 2023 Posted June 3, 2023 I guess that nothing is impossible with Steve. The real question is whether anybody will still wear heels. Will humans even exist? I guess I'll be dead and won't care.
Shyheels Posted June 3, 2023 Posted June 3, 2023 There is a kind of Fall-of-Rome feel to the world these days, isn’t there? 1 1
Cali Posted June 13, 2023 Author Posted June 13, 2023 (edited) Had some time to kill yesterday (or should I say 'time to slay'), so I went shoe shopping. Went to a Steve Madden store and tried a few heels, but nothing fit. Aldo had nothing I want and neither did Macy's. The Macy's had convert about 25% of their floor space to runners/sneakers. Sad. But the most disappointing store was the DSW. Heels are now less that 20% of the store space. Also nothing I wanted to buy. Edited June 13, 2023 by Cali
Cali Posted June 18, 2023 Author Posted June 18, 2023 (edited) A new first for me. I was walking out of the post office yesterday when a woman came running after me to tell me how much she liked my calves and wished she had calves like mine. Then she wondered if she should wear heels to get calves like mine. I just had to chulke.😀 Edited June 18, 2023 by Cali 1
mlroseplant Posted June 19, 2023 Posted June 19, 2023 I wonder what it is specifically that she desires?
Cali Posted June 19, 2023 Author Posted June 19, 2023 She was an older women 60 - 70 years old, probably without defined calves. Her's and mine PO Boxes are in the back of the post office and she followed me out.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now