Jump to content

Cali World


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Puffer said:

Not in the UK, at least with people who endeavour to communicate effectively.

You seem to forget I live in the UK. And writing and communication is my business. I do it effectively and have won awards for it, both in the UK and abroad.

I might add that the Cambridge Dictionary includes “to impress” as a secondary definition of slay. I haven’t consulted the Oxford but I expect they’ll have the same.

 

Edited by Shyheels

Posted
9 hours ago, Shyheels said:

You seem to forget I live in the UK. And writing and communication is my business. I do it effectively and have won awards for it, both in the UK and abroad.

I might add that the Cambridge Dictionary includes “to impress” as a secondary definition of slay. I haven’t consulted the Oxford but I expect they’ll have the same.

 

I am well aware of your residence and occupation - and that you grew up overseas.   Communication was a large part of my career too but has not embraced slang or idiomatic expressions in great depth, I am pleased to say.   The dictionary may well include the secondary definitions you mention but that is not to say that they will be used and understood as universally as you suggest.   I accept that the meanings exist, but not their appeal.

Posted

Like everyone I use idiom and slang and am familiar with their use by others. When I say I am a writer, I do not mean of legal documents, but of what are meant to be bright engaging magazine features using the full palette of the English language. And believe me the use of the word slay, as a metaphor, is common and widely understood to mean impress or entertain both here and around the world in the Universal English our language has become.

It was used as metaphor as far back as the 19th century, but it’s use it this sense has had skyrocketed in the past 50 years - starting in the 1970s, and led by the black, queer and Latin communities. Comedians have used it for years to indicate success, that they impressed or entertained. Its usage has accelerated even more in the past decade, popularised by stars like Beyonce and has widespread currency on Tik Tok. It is globally understood. 

 

Posted

I am not immune to the use of slang or idiom - in its place.   But I have learned to avoid it in both personal or professional communication in contexts where it might be misunderstood or inappropriate

 

I think we have both lost sight of the point here.   It was not so much the secondary meaning of 'slay' (with which I am slightly acquainted) but that of 'kill' in the apparent sense quoted by Cali as in 'you killed the look'.   What I cannot understand is that usage in the implied sense of met or fulfilled; it seems to me that anything 'killed' has been, at best, spoiled or stopped and at worst totally destroyed.   That point was not answered.

It may be commonplace for words or phrases to take on what are effectively opposite meanings in street parlance (e.g. wicked = good) but that is not to say that they should be universally adopted, especially when accuracy is required.   I can think of many historic examples where imprecise or inverted language has caused real confusion, sometimes dangerously.

Posted

I'm glad to say that English is shaped primarily by usage. A proud mongrel tongue, unashamed of immigration. Unlike French where the Institut Francais attempts, not always successfully, to impose its view of language on the people. They can stuff their "fin de semaine" where the sun don't shine.

There are many things I don't like about how our language is evolving. I live with them as part of a vibrant language. I even adopt some of them despite not really liking them. Such as "for free" rather than "free" or "for nothing". But if you ever catch me writing "would of" instead of "would have" you have permission to shoot me. But it may become accepted usage.

Posted (edited)

Why write “would of” when you can shorten it to “woulda”? 
 

In terms of the other part of the discussion, has no one ever heard the vaudevillian phrase “knock ‘em dead”? It’s not to be taken literally, any more than “break a leg”.  “Lay ‘em in the aisles” and “slay ‘em” have been around for ages and are widely understood, and an accepted part of the vernacular. “You killed the look” is similarly widely understood and accepted.

At any rate, I’m done with this. Seems to me we’ve hijacked Cali’s thread more than enough.

Edited by Shyheels
Posted

Language is simply a tool to communicate. It evolves over time, sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse. Slange is often seen as laziness. I'll argue it's often more efficient. 

Thank God for evolution, or we'd all be speaking old English. 

Posted

'Mary spent more than an hour with her make-up before going out on her special date.   She killed the look with extra blue eyeshadow.'

So, did she improve her appearance or ruin it?   (No peeping allowed.)

  • Like 1
Posted

In that context, it's good.

In sports if a team kills another it dominated it. So Mary dominated the look she was going for.

Posted
22 hours ago, Shyheels said:

I remember having to learn the prologue to The Canterbury Tales in Chaucerian English... 

As did I. I believe I can still get through the first eight lines of it.

11 hours ago, Puffer said:

'Mary spent more than an hour with her make-up before going out on her special date.   She killed the look with extra blue eyeshadow.'

So, did she improve her appearance or ruin it?   (No peeping allowed.)

 

10 hours ago, Jkrenzer said:

In that context, it's good.

In sports if a team kills another it dominated it. So Mary dominated the look she was going for.

I will have to disagree. It's still ambiguous. It probably means Mary did a good thing, but extra blue eye shadow is hardly ever a good thing. Setting aside my own biases, with the addition of one little word, "but," it would possibly change the whole meaning, and would be unambiguous. "But she killed the look with extra blue eye shadow."

Posted

Isn't the English language a rich one, with all its nuances and flexibility; more than a million words in all with contributions coming from 100 other languages.  

Posted

Back to heels.

It's the start of Short Season here, so I wore some old wedges with my shorts to work today.

shortseasonhh.JPG

  • Like 3
Posted

After the winter we had in this area, really happy to break out the sandals and shorts.

Posted

I’m boots and jeans year round, but I’ve certainly been glad to see some sunshine this past week. I know you guys over there had a lot of snow this year

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

We had 7 atmospheric rivers hit us this winter. major destruction - roads - piers - towns - hillsides -    floods ....

The ski slope I ski most often had over 60.5 feet (about 18.5 meters) of snow this year.

Edited by Cali
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I just read that in 2929 Steve Madden moved some of their production from China to Mexico and Brazil.

Posted

I guess that nothing is impossible with Steve. The real question is whether anybody will still wear heels. Will humans even exist? I guess I'll be dead and won't care.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Had some time to kill yesterday (or should I say 'time to slay'), so I went shoe shopping. Went to a Steve Madden store and tried a few heels, but nothing fit. Aldo had nothing I want and neither did Macy's.  The Macy's had convert about 25% of their floor space to runners/sneakers.  Sad.

But the most disappointing store was the DSW. Heels are now less that 20% of the store space. Also nothing I wanted to buy.

Edited by Cali
Posted (edited)

A new first for me.

I was walking out of the post office yesterday when a woman came running after me to tell me how much she liked my calves and wished she had calves like mine. Then she wondered if she should wear heels to get calves like mine.  I just had to chulke.😀

Edited by Cali
  • Like 1
Posted

She was an older women 60 - 70 years old, probably without defined calves. Her's and mine PO Boxes are in the back of the post office and she followed me out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using High Heel Place, you agree to our Terms of Use.