Jump to content

azraelle

Members
  • Posts

    861
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by azraelle

  1. 15:23:45] Me: by proving that you're an ignorant narrow minded little squit?

    [15:24:02] NarrowMinded: a squit?

    Squit, also meaning weakfish, which is a marine food and game fish found in North American Atlantic waters. I used it in a derogatory fashion. I was almost certain it wouldn't be in his vocabulary, so I'm fairly safe on that one. I was tempted to define it to him as a drop of semen, just so he could understand what I thought of him, but decided against that plan.

    My first thought was "squit" = "Coney Island Whitefish", e.g. a used prophelactic!

    I look at it this way:

    Girls don't (in general) care for anal intercourse, so why should it be inferred that a guy wearing girls' clothes (or boots) likes or wants it??

  2. On the subject of "lyrical allegories" which the coloring book song reminds me of....My dad used to sing this to his own guitar accompaniment (originally recorded by Hank Thompson around 1951--b4 I was born!). Originally I just liked the melody, but my divorce has brought some new meaning to the words. :wink: When I was young and went to school They taught me how to write To take the chalk and make a mark And hope it turns out right Well that's the way it is with love And what you did to me I wrote it so you'd know That I was yours eternally (Chorus) But my tears have washed I love you From the blackboard of my heart It's too late to clean the slate And make another start I'm satisfied the way things are Although we're far apart My tears have washed I love you from The blackboard of my heart If you'd been true the way you should And not have gone astray These tears would not have fallen down And washed the words away No need to talk, 'cause if the chalk Should write those words again It will be for someone else Not things that might have been

  3. i wish that the heels boots from the 1970s contiue to the present time...i was a little boy back then... :(

    i am sure the heeled boots for men will spread out to regular stores all over the world. I wanna say a important thing....BOOTS RULES!!! :D

    Give it time--"what goes around comes around" was never more true than in fashion.

    Besides, if religious predictions that the final days will be like unto the days of Noah, which were similar to the conditions of Sodom and Gomorah (e.g. San Francisco!), mainstream feminine fashion for men may be "just around the corner".

    :wink::D

  4. Chemin de Fer

    (sorry, couldn't resist, referring to a briefly popular brand of teenager's jeans circa 1977 that were tight-fitting, had a "saddleback" seat which, er, emphasized the derriere, shall we say, :wink: and an inward-slanting sailor button front panel that had similar effects for the frontal areas. Gawd I wish I'd bought a pair back then, so I could duplicate the style now--I can't even locate any pictures of them!) :D

    That's clearly unrelated to "Railway", so I didn't, really, deviate from the stated objective of this thread!!

  5. At least there is some standardization in shoe sizing--rarely does one mfr stray more than a half size from the norm. Be thankful the situation isn't the same as Women's Dress and Pant sizes--they're all over the map, trying to cater to the fickle (and often blatently false) images that many women too often have of themselves. Marketing is the name of the game--if a size 20 woman can be made to think that she is actually a size 14, then she doesn't think she's fat, feels better about herself, keeps on eating, and expresses her gratitude to the mfr or designer that made her so thin by buying more of their line of dresses/jeans/etc. :drinking: :wink:

  6. I like what Eddie Izzard said about himself--that he was a "male lesbian". Although I am QUITE straight, as a man, I have often felt that if I had been born a woman and been presented with the choice of men that I grew up with, not to mention those I had to work with at the Nevada (nuclear) Test Site, that I would have either chosen celibacy, or turned to other women. Just a thought :wink:

  7. Make up is to difficult and complicated to put on and get it "right." It's a real art and a usually turns out bad if you aren't proficient. Besides, its too difficult to remove. It takes about three days before all traces are gone.

    If you put it on correctly, with foundation as a base, it's not difficult to remove with, for example, an Aveeno oatmeal bar, and it sure doesn't last 3 days! Not complicated or difficult to put on--just time-consuming; and you need to set aside some time to see what works, and what doesn't--in other words to exercise your creative and artistic talents--with no thought about going out until you have perfected your technique to produce repeatable results. I'm not talking from experience, much, from so-called over-the-counter women's makeup, but rather from a stage makeup class I signed up for in my first year back in college, ostensibly for the purpose of giving me some idea how to manipulate shadows and highlights of faces, digitally, using some program like Photoshop or Strata (cheap-ass imitation of 3dStudio Max). But the techniques I learned are essentially the same for over-the-counter cosmetics as well. I highly recommend such a class to anyone, male or female, as you learn alot (I learned to really appreciate the effort that women take to look good--for hair and makeup, 2 hours is not unheard-of every day of their lives), it was alot of fun, and I was able to learn how to "let my hair down" again. :D:wink:
  8. My wife and I had had 5 before the divorce, 2-d's, 3-s's. Glutton for punishment? Glutton for Joy, rather, I'd say. No amount of "punishment" could ever erase the joy and happiness that children bring if you are willing to put their needs above your own (and if you're not you shouldn't even consider being a parent in the first place--unfortunately, becoming a parent is usually the last thing that is on the minds of unmarried teens "in love" :wink: ).

  9. Not meaning to gross you out, Laurie, but since you are of a size that many of the guys on this forum can fit into, have you considered the "titilation factor" here? It is a possiblity that some guys may get extreme pleasure out of wearing shoes formerly worn by a woman, rather than a man (e.g. the shoes that are sold by Hiluc, Xaphod, etc., on occasion). I am not in this category, oddly enough--I find the idea strangely fascinating and revolting at the same time. The point is, though, that your old shoes may prove to be quite valuable if you sell them in the typical 6-day ebay auction fashion--towards moving/wedding expenses, or whatever. :D:wink:

  10. I posted this to another thread, but at the risk of being drummed off the board as a modern-day heretic, let me share with you two small facets of "Mormon doctrine", to wit:

    " As man is now, God once was; as God is now, man may become "

    (--attributed to Joseph Smith)

    [Jehovah, as the God of this world, speaking in vision to Abraham] "Worlds without number have I created..." and "[paraphrased] I have done nothing that I have not seen my Father do..."

    By the way, Julietta, nice to see that you've returned, and thanks for condolences regarding my mother. :wink:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using High Heel Place, you agree to our Terms of Use.