Terry Posted November 18, 2004 Share Posted November 18, 2004 I wasn't talking about you, Jeff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn HH Posted November 19, 2004 Share Posted November 19, 2004 JeffM:-) I think that you are reading something into the posts that was not intended in the beginning. I was referring to the pics as they were posted originally. I wasn't inferring anything against you personally or anyone else. I personally don't waste my time in porn of any kind. This is why I like this forum over all others as porn or other distasteful things are not permitted to be published. This is a nice family oriented form of entertainment, in my opinion. I'm here to talk to and make friends, and express my personal opinions, not milign (SP) anyone's reputation. Friendly cheers--- Dawn HH High Heeled Boots Forever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffM Posted November 19, 2004 Share Posted November 19, 2004 To Terry and Dawn, my apologies to you both. Earlier I had said The pictures are about the body, not high heels, not boots or shoes but just her body and what she is doing with her hands. Not what I joined this board for. Then Terry you said I think pychiatrists would say when some men (see previous posts) don't care as much about a female body as they do about an item of clothing...i.e. shoes, that becomes a fetish (perversion) item. So I assumed it referred to what I said. Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn HH Posted November 19, 2004 Share Posted November 19, 2004 JeffM:-) No problem. Cheers--- Dawn HH High Heeled Boots Forever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffM Posted November 19, 2004 Share Posted November 19, 2004 Thanks Dawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris100575 Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 I've just read back through this thread. GSH has posted offensive comments several times, including referring to women as "sluts" on more than one occasion. Now all us guys who wear heels are "perverted". GSH, if you don't like this site why don't you go somewhere else instead of going out of your way to try and offend people? If only this forum had an "ignore list"! Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatspikeheels Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 the basis for this site is a perversion (i.e. fetish) for high heels... If you are a male and your perversion for high heels includes taking pictures of yourself in the like then simply place the photo's in the campartment that was created for such items... the word perversion is not negative, and if you don't think men wearing high heels isn't straying from the "norm" (whatever the norm is) then it isn't a perversion. But i think men taking pics of themselves in heels is a bit of a perversion. Not intended to carry a negative meaning... Not attempting to offend, just curious why someone is laying rules as to whether a picture is appropriate or not, after all it is an open forum. Had the shoes in question been a 6 inch spike i don't think this banter would have started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatspikeheels Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 I hope you can figure out how to use it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris100575 Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 It seems I owe you something of an apology GSH. I hadn't realised that you didn't mean "perversion" in a negative way, but to me "pervert" has negative connotations. Believe me, I don't find pictures of guys in high heels in the slightest bit arousing, but as I appreciate shoes in a non-sexual way I still like people sharing pics of their shoe collection. If they're male so be it. As to whether the pictures are appropriate, the title of the thread does state "and other fetish things". To be honest though Polvorita's sole contribution to the site seems to be promoting his own, which is arguably spam. I'm sure the moderators will decide whether or not the pictures are close enough to porn to be removed. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffM Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 GSH Had the shoes in question been a 6 inch spike I don't think this banter would have started. Exactly, the pic are then about the shoes if her poses allowed the shoes to be seen. She isnt wearing shoes/boots that can be seen properly so the pics are about the body. This site is not about body pics at all. Its about shoes and boots, even the most ugly ones. At least thats what I believe. Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anita C. Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 If it walks like a duck, has feathers & quacks, it's a duck, babe. This set is ok if you like it. I don't. Now I LUV the pics of heels! ESPECIALLY in real life situations! What do I define as porn? Easy! Genetal pix, c** shots, oral copulation, the "Back Door" thing (EEEEEYUK!), etc. get my drift? If that's your thing you have at it & by all means enjoy yourself! That's YOUR perogative. Just don't expect me to like it or think it's 'so cool' when I just don't! My sex life is between me & my partner. I don't kiss & tell & I prefer to keep it in the boudoir' & there it shall stay, thank you very much! Photos are NOT an option. If that makes me a prude, so be it. Namaste', Anita C. "Spike Heels . . a Pork-pie hat . . Have on the mend in no time flat . . Ten Minutes 'Till The Savages Come by Manhatten Transfer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba136 Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Gosh Anita, I wonder what your take on this issue is. Now, why don't you tell us how you really feel? (I agree with you, by the way) Being mentally comfortable in your own mind is the key to wearing heels in public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn HH Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 Anita C.:-) I also agree with you. Cheers--- Dawn HH High Heeled Boots Forever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calv Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 Anita, Dawn, I said my bit on Page 1 of this thread, and to quote some US senator, 'I can't define porn, but I know it when I see it'. Xa (on calv's computer) Do your own thing. Don't be a victim of conformity. Calv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaijin gig Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 She has a great rear end... Does she have a sister? Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xaphod Posted March 4, 2006 Share Posted March 4, 2006 oiybit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmc Posted March 5, 2006 Share Posted March 5, 2006 Actually that "definition" of pornography (obscenity) came from Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in 1964. Have a happy time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts