Louboutin Pigalle Vs So Kate

[Majo]

Has anybody seen the So Kate in a store. I have a pair of Pigalles and, from the pictures I've browsed in the Louboutin site it seems there is little or no difference.

[Dr. Shoe]

It looks as if the So Kates have higher heels.

[hh4evr1]

I saw both in store recently and the So Kate had higher heels and the cut of the vamp was slightly different. From a distance/photo they could look the same.

[Majo]

Well... Pigalle comes in 120mm version too.

Maybe the difference is in the vamp, hh4evr1.

 

Thanks for your reply

[Rockpup]

The toe looks pointier maybe?

[Amanda]

The So kates are a revved up version of Pigalle. The heel is higher also slimmer. The toe shorter and vamp more revealing and on the whole slightly less wearable. But then that's not really a consideration is it.

If you're in the market for something along the same lines then you might want to consider Jimmy choo's anouks which are very similar looking but eminently more wearable and better quality that's my opinion anyway.

[shoebidoo]

@MIss Amanda. I agree. The Jimmy Choo " Anouk" pumps are at the moment a better choice than Louboutins "So Kate". We have a pair of gold/black Pigalles 120. We like the Anouks wearabilty and looks a lot :-).

[shoebidoo]

Found this handy comparison on pinterest

[hh4evr1]

I have both pairs. Recently got the So Kate's and find them more comfortable to wear than the Pigalle's.

[Majo]

Thanks for the replies. The picture shoebidoo posted makes things clear.

Cheers.