Arctic Posted December 21, 2008 Posted December 21, 2008 that's why it's posted in the "fetish" section.... You can talk about 18 inch heels and ballet boots without creating porn. Just as much as you could have a ballet boot in a shop window and not break any law or offend anyone. That doesn't seem so difficult to understand. What's all the fuss about?
LukeVibertUK Posted December 21, 2008 Posted December 21, 2008 You can talk about 18 inch heels and ballet boots without creating porn. Just as much as you could have a ballet boot in a shop window and not break any law or offend anyone. That doesn't seem so difficult to understand. Ultra High Heels and fetish things - Here you can discuss 7" heels, foot training/stretching, ballet boots, corsetry, wet and messy, worn shoes and related fetish interests. Perhaps this heading needs to include "No Nudity" just to make things crystal clear to those new to the forum still finding their feet. "Fetish related interest" can cover a whole load of different subjects... I personally think that if you are going to be heading into a Fetish Area of the forum then something more "fruity" than other areas of the board are going to be shown and need to be adult about it. The mods are in a position to moderate content if they feel obliged and doesn't meet the rules. I personally don't see what the fuss is. Someone posted something they shouldn't, it got moderated...thats part of life in an Internet forum isn't it?
Trolldeg Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 You can talk about 18 inch heels and ballet boots without creating porn. Where's the porn?
Stilettoscot Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 As I see it, anythin including the crotch is "porn", yet these pics fall a bit short of it. Walking in ultra-highs because it's exciting...and it is!!
William Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 I'm looking... I'm looking... Where's the porn of which you speak? Don't tease me like this! It's just not funny. William -- waiting for some pics of shoe porn (I guess)
Arctic Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 nuff said... I think Stilettoscot's rule is not a bad one. Personally, I follow Tech's logic: don't post anything you don't want your own kids to see. I take my kids out when I am in heels and feel as a parent that I am doing the right thing, in the sense that I expose them to the concept of free choice - also in clothing. But as they are still very young, I am careful to not expose them to sexuality, a concept they do not understand, as there is no added value and a lot of potential damage. And as IMO the internet is a mirror of real life, I see no reason to apply different rules to TV, internet, and day-to-day things. @Troll: When you are a little older and maybe have kids of your own I think you will understand the following better: I would not want my kids to see the pictures the guy from Kazakhstan in the opening post, as it would not be possible to explain it to satisfaction with "that gentleman thinks that is a nice outfit" in the same way as I _can_ explain to my kids that I wear boots with heels because I like them, in the same way as their mother wears them. I'm from the Nordic countries too, am very open minded, and our kids see their parents naked all the time without blinking an eye. But all kids have the right to grow up in an unsexual environment. That is a human right. For that reason there are laws to ensure that they don't get exposed to certain things. If you walk on the streets of Stockholm or Amsterdam like the opening poster's pictures, and definitely with private parts hanging out, you get thrown in jail - no matter how progressive the environment. What's all the fuss about?
Stilettoscot Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 Arctic, Had this thread been placed in any other forum, I would wager it'd have been moved here on an instant. The fact that this forum is labelled as "Fetish" may impy a bit of "risque`" stuff that you (and I and many others) would not want their kids to see. Now, I personally would have preferred to see just the shoes, and his kink may not be his own, but I feel it is in the proper place. But, of course, the "line" can be abused...so we are watching. Walking in ultra-highs because it's exciting...and it is!!
JL Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 The horse if officially dead. The cause of the horse's death was a long and drawn out beating. Can this thread be locked, we all move on, and know that there is no room for pornography on this site??? Happy holidays. Men's 13W : Women's 15/16
Stilettoscot Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 I agree that there's nothing else to say except the horse beating started after the horse bought the farm...thread closed. Walking in ultra-highs because it's exciting...and it is!!
Recommended Posts