Robert Posted May 15, 2003 Posted May 15, 2003 For me is the look that the heels are off the ground attractive Boots, fascinating footwear http://s70.photobucket.com/albums/i103/Boots_1956/
High Surprise Posted May 15, 2003 Author Posted May 15, 2003 Interesting one Robert - never thought of that. For me, the feet need to be firmly on the ground with ALL the weight on the feet. Hmmm. Interesting.
Robert Posted May 15, 2003 Posted May 15, 2003 Interesting one Robert - never thought of that. For me, the feet need to be firmly on the ground with ALL the weight on the feet. Hmmm. Interesting. You mean all the weight on the toes? Boots, fascinating footwear http://s70.photobucket.com/albums/i103/Boots_1956/
HHfanatic Posted May 16, 2003 Posted May 16, 2003 "For me is the look that the heels are off the ground attractive" Yeah, agree. If the weight is loaded on the toes you will see more of the muscles in the foot. Espesially if the foot is in an open sandal.
High Surprise Posted May 16, 2003 Author Posted May 16, 2003 I actually appreciate the look of the foot when the weight is more on the ball of the foot/the toes - yes. The muscles I don't find are so visible normally. Just my opinion anyway.... The weight on the foot simply shows fragility/femininity. I just adore it. Does that makes sense?
HHfanatic Posted May 16, 2003 Posted May 16, 2003 Yepp, to me it does. I have a picture at home of Elisabeth Carson in dorsey cut hh pumps standing on one foot. She has great musclar legs and feets. I will try find this picture and copy it into the forum next week.
HHfanatic Posted May 18, 2003 Posted May 18, 2003 Maybe a stupid question, but how to I add a picture with my text?
Robert Posted May 18, 2003 Posted May 18, 2003 The best way is to see how others have done this. You can press on "edit" in the upper right hand corner of a message with a picture. But in short when you want to post a picture in your message you press on "img" (an opening tag appear), then you can put in the url and press a second time on "img" this will have the closing tag. Boots, fascinating footwear http://s70.photobucket.com/albums/i103/Boots_1956/
High Surprise Posted May 19, 2003 Author Posted May 19, 2003 So now you know HHfanatic.... So we eagerly await your pics.....
HHfanatic Posted May 20, 2003 Posted May 20, 2003 I tried several times yesterday but I dont manage to paste in the picture. Do the picture have to be on the net or is it ok to have the picture on my own PC?
Robert Posted May 20, 2003 Posted May 20, 2003 The picture must be on the internet. You can read about uploading in the thread here or in short go to http://65.160.96.70/hhplace/ and upload your picture. Remember the location of the picture which this server will give you and insert it in your message in the way descripted a few posts above. Succes! Boots, fascinating footwear http://s70.photobucket.com/albums/i103/Boots_1956/
High Surprise Posted May 20, 2003 Author Posted May 20, 2003 Good luck HHfanatic!!! It's complicated isn't it??? I had the same issues as you so don't worry - you're not alone.
HHfanatic Posted May 20, 2003 Posted May 20, 2003 Okay, here we go, my first picture on this board. http://65.160.96.70/hhplace/images/1053448375.jpg Give it a try and see how it works
High Surprise Posted May 20, 2003 Author Posted May 20, 2003 Woo hoo - nice on HHfanatic!! Well done. You did it. I have seen that pic before and love it. Doesn't this show how beautiful the angle of the foot is within the shoe? Pure beauty! You have to have nice feet for shoes like that. Keep e'm coming HHfanatic. Thanks!
HHfanatic Posted May 20, 2003 Posted May 20, 2003 I just love a beautyful female foot in a high heel shoe, even if the foot is in an open sandal or claded by leather in a tight boot. Like something magic.......... I have a few other pictures of Elisabeth Carson on another PC. I will copy them into the board within a couple of days.
High Surprise Posted May 21, 2003 Author Posted May 21, 2003 That would be great HHfanatic. I am with you there. The female foot is simply beautiful and can be displayed sometime like a piece of art (if within the right pair of shoes). I tend to find that the higher the heel, the more the shape of the foot is normally shown off. Thanks again for that!
HHfanatic Posted May 21, 2003 Posted May 21, 2003 Another of Elisabeth Carson, great legs and feets ............ hmmmmmmm http://65.160.96.70/hhplace/images/1053536803.jpg
High Surprise Posted May 22, 2003 Author Posted May 22, 2003 HHfanatic - you pick only the best pics. Thanks once again for sharing that with us all. Elisabeth Carson certainly has a good body. A little on the muscely side I would say but somehow she gets away with it. Her feet always look great in her heels. Can't put my finger on why???
High Surprise Posted May 22, 2003 Author Posted May 22, 2003 She really does! All thos muscles but still looking good!
HHfanatic Posted May 24, 2003 Posted May 24, 2003 Another Elisabeth picture ............. http://65.160.96.70/hhplace/images/1053753463.jpg
HHfanatic Posted May 24, 2003 Posted May 24, 2003 My last Elisabeth picture.......... http://65.160.96.70/hhplace/images/1053756451.jpg
High Surprise Posted May 27, 2003 Author Posted May 27, 2003 FANTASTIC work HHfanatic!! She really is amazing. Somehow the curve of her feet in her heels always looks perfect (I can't work out how she does it????) Any ideas? Is it her toned body? The size of her feet?
HHfanatic Posted May 28, 2003 Posted May 28, 2003 It must be her wellshaped body. To me she seems to be doing some bodybuilding, but still magage to find the fine balance between staying slim and muscular. I have seen some other pictures and she do have a lovely body, if you like the slim, muscular type of body on a female. I do............
High Surprise Posted May 28, 2003 Author Posted May 28, 2003 It's funny because I don't normally appreciate seeing muscley women but she does seem to get away with it, doesn't she?
High Surprise Posted May 28, 2003 Author Posted May 28, 2003 See how wonderful her curved feet look again. How on earth does she do it? I just don't get it. Thanks for that!
Yamyam Posted May 29, 2003 Posted May 29, 2003 Oh, I don't know. I tend to prefer cuddlier, woman-shaped women myself. I don't see the attraction of muscular women, altho' that's probably because I'm fairly pear-shaped myself at 5'9" in socks and 12st, and I can't take the competition Obsessed is such a strong word. I prefer to think of myself as "differently enthusiastic"
Recommended Posts