kromozome Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 HOLLYWOOD - JULY 21: Actor Jason Ritter (wearing high heels) arrives at the opening night of "Hairspray" on July 21, 2004 at the Pantages Theatre in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Amanda Edwards/Getty Images) Have Fun with Heels KroMoZome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey S. Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 I think he had no choice or he would have been slightly 'shorter' than the girl in the rightmost picture... CU! -Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new_look Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 i think it didnt co-ordinate with his outfit so well. Had they been black they wouldve made a nice outfit. it seems that any male celebrities who do ever wear heels wear something daft that noone would wear anyway, therefore would never take off as a trend cos noone thinks it looks good. At least looking smarter, some people will be persuaded maybe? i think its a bit of bad advertising Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicole Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 i think it didnt co-ordinate with his outfit so well. Had they been black they wouldve made a nice outfit. it seems that any male celebrities who do ever wear heels wear something daft that noone would wear anyway, therefore would never take off as a trend cos noone thinks it looks good. At least looking smarter, some people will be persuaded maybe? i think its a bit of bad advertising I like the look- but either his shirt should be lighter blue or the shoes darker blue. That way, the coordination would have been better. the truth shall make you fret Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shyguy Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 I agree with Daz, the overall look just isn't right. It could have been done so much better and then would have looked good instead of just attention grabbing. And surely his wardrobe people should have advised him better. He was so narrow minded he could see through a keyhole with both eyes. Brown's Law: If the shoe fits, it's ugly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoverfly Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 Blk heel boots, would haved worked great. Blue heels......yech Hello,  my name is Hoverfly. I’m a high heel addict…. Weeeeeeeeeee!  👠1998 to 2022! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new_look Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 i know. i think its hard to make blue heels of that colour look good with nearly anything. It looks a cheap crappy colour. As shyguy said, he was just trying anothe outrageous look, which will make people spring him to mind anytime anyone mentions heels on a man. With a better outfit he could have promoted a different, but smart image which im sure some would have made people think positive for us heel guys, instead of 'outrageous' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kneehighs Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 I saw these pics on Getty images too. I was wondering if he has ever played the part of a woman? I haven't seen Hairspray yet, but what was his real reason for wearing heels? Any speculations out there? Feminine Style . Masculine Soul. Skin In The Game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genebujold Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 Daz, others, you're right - blue=yech! Perhaps with another outfit, but not black! How would he have looked wearing my Franco Sarto boots in my avatar? Much better, I would imagine! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shyguy Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 Yeah your Francos would have made the look stylish. Much nicer overall. And as many have said those blue shoes would be hard to match with anything. However black would have been very smart and as Daz states made a better impression for all me who want to/ do wear heels out. He was so narrow minded he could see through a keyhole with both eyes. Brown's Law: If the shoe fits, it's ugly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffB Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 Perhaps he intentionally wore that color in order to get noticed. Just a thought! I don't want to LOOK like a woman, I just want to DRESS like a woman! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoverfly Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 Perhaps he intentionally wore that color in order to get noticed. Just a thought! Yeah, people noticed all right.... yeck bad match. You would think that wearing heels would be enough to get noticed. I mean it does not matter what color of heels for a women to be wearing. She most likly get noticed, though higher the better. Hello,  my name is Hoverfly. I’m a high heel addict…. Weeeeeeeeeee!  👠1998 to 2022! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba136 Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 Yes, I agree. He probably wore them as an afterthought. Being mentally comfortable in your own mind is the key to wearing heels in public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockpup Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 Isn't the old showbiz saying that "any publicity is good publicity"? Would we have discussed his involvement in the play if he'd worn regular loafers with his outfit? Jim (formerly known as "JimC") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new_look Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 our point exactly. noticed for the wrong reasons - not look at him in heels, but what a crap combination between a smart dressed man and the footwear of a podium dancer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TXT-1 Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 that colour combination is a very poor choice, if he wore black versions of those heels He could have carried it off well but everyone has at least one brain fart in their life! later, TXT-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azraelle Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 Tthe color matches his shirt, perhaps not the tint, but the color. Being a guy, it might have been rather more difficult to find the perferct tint in his size than it would have been if he was a girl, with a typical female foot size. Give the guy a break!!! "All that you can decide, is what to do with the time that is given you."--Gandalf, "Life is not tried, it is merely survived -If you're standing outside the fire."--Garth Brooks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new_look Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 easier to find black than blue if that was the problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heelfan Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 Come on guys this is ridiculous! I thoroughly applaud Azraelle's comment - "Give the guy a break!". I'm ashamed to see you lot (some of whom are my friends and fellow street-heelers) bitching away so cattily about the comparatively minor matter of colour-taste. Can I remind you that some of you are the self-same guys who have been moaning on and on about how unfair it is that guys-in-heels is not a mainstream fashion and why can't male stars like David Beckham legitimise it by putting it into high-profile practice. And yet, blow me, when similar star Jason Ritter actually DOES have the courage to do it magnificently in the spotlight, I hardly hear any "Great"s or "Well Done"s or anything, but only petty cribbing about the colour! Anyone outsider logging on to these threads could be forgiven for thinking that we're a bunch of old moaners instead of looking at the positive aspects. Acting positive gets things achieved. Constantly moaning doesn't. So from Azrealle and me at least:- "VERY WELL DONE JASON RITTER! LET'S HOPE MORE STREET-HEELING GUYS WILL FOLLOW SUIT, BOTH THE FAMOUS AND THE LESS WELL KNOWN!". Cheerfully yours, Heelfan Onwards and upwards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genebujold Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 VERY WELL DONE JASON RITTER! LET'S HOPE MORE STREET-HEELING GUYS WILL FOLLOW SUIT, BOTH THE FAMOUS AND THE LESS WELL KNOWN!. Cheerfully yours, Heelfan Of course we're thrilled someone noteworthy had the guts to wear heels in public. As for "advancing the cause," however, particularly with respect to mainstream acceptance, one's choice of fashion and color goes a long ways in either direction (acceptance/rejection). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new_look Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 all we were saying is that as someone had taken the trouble to wear heels as a guy, with guys clothes, a pair of black shoes wouldve made the outfit look smart, and perhaps a suggestion of a new fashionable look. instead he chose such an outrageous look that anyone looking, even us heel guys said that looks crap, and anyone else would too. As firefox often point out about the outrageous styles and us getting laughed at, a woman wouldnt really wear such heels too, and i cant remember ever seeing a woman with bright blue shoes as casual wear. Well done to him wearing the heels fair enough, but he is doing nothing to promote our image of men in heels, as people just continue to either think fetish, gay or completely outrageous-none of which are 'mainstream' fashion or in the queue for wide acceptance as normal clothing. daz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heelfan Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 There's no pleasing some people! Cheerfully yours, Heelfan Onwards and upwards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockpup Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 Alot of us would like to wear heels while blending in. I saw a guy in ft lauderdale the other day wearing ~2-2.5" heel sandals just wandering around shopping. I applaud both this guy for just doing his thing as I do applaud Ritter for going for it. Even if celebrities get more leeway then most of us for pushing, or crossing fashion boundries. Also.. in my opinion the comments about color choise are due to us being used to people (men and women) wearing heels, so being comfortable with the thought of a guy in heels, we shift over to thoughts of how to improve the view. It does appear that the women he's next to in two of the pics is a bit taller then him, as they are close with him in heels. Should we be lucky enough for him to wear 5" heeled shoes/boots if she decides to wear moderate heels? Seeya Jim (formerly known as "JimC") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new_look Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 depends how tall she (or short he) really is. who knows they may already be 5' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoverfly Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 I have to agree, in this case image is very important. In case of wearing a high heels as a man, he needs to be taken seriously in order for others to honestly judge that person and to accept it as being normal, not as a freak. But then again, what is normal? Hello,  my name is Hoverfly. I’m a high heel addict…. Weeeeeeeeeee!  👠1998 to 2022! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockpup Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 In my world.. I am normal. (formerly known as "JimC") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pam Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 Cheers for Jason!!! I saw the news on E! and thought that we need more events like this one to push heels for men forward. Even though "Hairspray" is a play that has to do with crossdressing, jason was wearing heels as a man, he could have dressed as a girl just for the kicks and for the good time. Instead he figured out how to dress a man's outfit with some cool stilettoes! THe cool thing is that this action put people to think...and I'll bet you that at least one person said....hey it looks good! That is the kind of reaction that we need to get a trend started! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genebujold Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 There's no pleasing some people! Cheerfully yours, Heelfan Sorry, Heelfan, but I agree with Daz - he should have had more taste. Think of it this way... If I were to advance a new style of clothing on men, which style would I be more successful in advancing? This? Or this? They're both non-birfurcated garments, and while I'll back anyone else's choice, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize I'd have more success advancing the long dark skirt as a men's fashion than the flowered mini. Same thing's true with Jason's heels. While I'm indeed glad he had the guts to go forth with it, I think the public reaction towards the idea was overall negative, whereas if he'd worn something like my Franco Sartos, the public reaction would have been positive, perhaps others would have even been intrigued to follow suite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azraelle Posted August 3, 2004 Share Posted August 3, 2004 OH PSHAW!!! Given the choice I not only would, but actually DO, wear other colors besides black, when I can find them in my size that is. If we are truly fighting for "men's fashion freedom" then the wearing of colorful footwear, as well as pants and shirts, should be a major part of the conflict. Otherwise, what is the point--Why F***ing Bother? I cannot abide Henry Ford's "You can have it in any color you want so long as it is black" applied to boots and/or shoes. I am not saying that I would wear bright blue boots or shoes, now, but if by some fashion miracle it becomes generally fashionable for the ladies, I might consider it. Because a men's version (in an "appropriately subdued" color or style) usually comes down the pike in a year or two. Specifics that I own, and wear: two pairs of very narrow ~4" heeled boots from PayLess, one in "peanut brittle", one in tan; and another pair of PayLess boots with 3" modified blade heels in cordovan (deep dark reddish brown). Nothing blue, mainly because of lack of opportunity to buy non-fetish styled colors in my size. Again I say give the guy a break. And yes I (for one) HAVE seen women wear such colors in heels, albeit for very dress-up affairs, which I might point out, was what Mr. Ritter was attending... "All that you can decide, is what to do with the time that is given you."--Gandalf, "Life is not tried, it is merely survived -If you're standing outside the fire."--Garth Brooks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heelfan Posted August 3, 2004 Share Posted August 3, 2004 Firstly - I agree again with Azraelle. What's the point of wanting men's fashion freedom and then qualifying that by saying "As long as it's black". Girls wear shoes in all colours of the rainbow, so it's hardly giving fashion equality to limit guys to one colour! But secondly and more importantly, you guy-moaners are all missing my earlier point. I'm not so much saying none of you should avoid saying you prefer a black shoe to blue, but I',m saying it's a matter of priority of emphasis: There's precious few male stars who appear publically in high heels apart from freaky pop bands and tv/drag/pantomime queens. So at least first why not give Jason a thundering great WELL DONE JASON as the main part of your postings, with maybe 10% at the end mentioning the colour if you so choose. I repeat what I said earlier, by contrast it comes over as bitchy and catty and unappreciative if you lot immediately wade into his colour choice without even complimenting him on his bold shoe statement first. If he and other young stars were to read your posts, it would hardly encourage any of them to press on with heels in public. That it my main point - the question of emphasis. A bit of congratulation never comes amiss before expressing the odd reservation. Cheerfully yours, Heelfan Onwards and upwards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts